Comparison of electron capture and beta decay rates in high temperature environment in explosion of supernova type II

R. Baruah1

1HRH The Prince of Wales Institute of Engineering and Technology, India

Keywords: nucleosysthesis, entropy, abundances
property: reflectivity
material: near critical fluids

It is generally acknowledged that Type II supernova result from the collapse of iron core of a massive star which, at least in some cases, produces a neutron star. At this stage, the neutrinos are produced by neutronization which speeds up as collapse continues. During collapse an outward bound shock wave forms in the matter falling onto the nearly stationary core which shows reflectivity of matter. The conditions behind the shock at 100 to 200 km are suitable for neutrino heating. This neutrino heating blows a hot bubble above the protoneutron star and is the most important source of energy for Supernova explosion. At this stage, we try to attain the r-process (rapid neutron capture process) path responsible for the production of heavy elements beyond iron, which are otherwise not possible to be formed by fusion reactions. The most interesting evolution occurs as temperature falls from 1010 K to 109 K. At these high temperature conditions, the near critical fluids after fusion reactions are forbidden and transform into the respective atoms by r-process path which on beta decaying produce the ultimate elements of the periodic chart. Another astrophysical parameter needed for our analysis is neutron number density which we take to be greater than 1020 cm-3. With these, at different entropy environments, we assign the neutron binding energy that represents the r-process path in the chart of nuclides. Along the path, the experimental data of observed elements matches our calculated one. It is found that the dynamical timescale of the final collapse is dominated by electron capture on nuclei and not on free protons. It is also found that the beta decay rates are much higher than the corresponding electron capture rates at the same classical condition.

  1. Borzov , I. N. & Goriely , S. 2000, Phys. Rev. C, 62, 03550

  2. Burbidge , E. M. , Burbidge, G. R., Fowler, W. A. & Hoyle, F. 1957, Rev. Mod. Phys.29,547

  3. Meyer B. S., Mathews G. J., Howard W. M., Woosley S. E. & Hoffman R. D., 1992, ApJ 399, 656

  4. Tamamura , M., Wanajo, S., Itoh, N., Nomoto, K. & Nozawa , S. 2003, Nucl. Phys. A , 718, 638c

     Official Sponsors

uni Anter_logo Tziolas_logo_ linseis netzsch